40 posts
  • 2 / 4
  • 1
  • 2
  • 4
 by RAMMAN76
2 weeks 1 day ago
 Total posts:   565  
 Joined:  Nov 15 2021
United States of America   Fort Worth TX
Veteran

Florida State DT Braden Fiske Film & Combine Recap | Beau Allen Breakdown
Defense wins championships!


 by 69RamFan
2 weeks 1 day ago
 Total posts:   3208  
 Joined:  Oct 15 2016
United States of America   LA CA by way of NY/NJ
Superstar

Elvis wrote:Yeah it's a lot, this year's 2, a 5 and next year's 2...


If the RAMs win the SB, then that 2025 2nd pick is more like a 3rd round pick.

 by Elvis
2 weeks 1 day ago
 Total posts:   38705  
 Joined:  Mar 28 2015
United States of America   Los Angeles
Administrator

69RamFan wrote:If the RAMs win the SB, then that 2025 2nd pick is more like a 3rd round pick.


And the Rams have another 3rd round comp coming next year for Raheem, but anyway you slice it, it's a lot.

Not saying it's a bad trade or anything like that but it's till a lot as far as that goes...

 by BrooklynRam74
2 weeks 1 day ago
 Total posts:   199  
 Joined:  Dec 07 2022
United States of America   LA Coliseum
Rookie

Elvis wrote:And the Rams have another 3rd round comp coming next year for Raheem, but anyway you slice it, it's a lot.

Not saying it's a bad trade or anything like that but it's till a lot as far as that goes...


It's definitely a lot. Rams could have approximated the value giving this year's pick 83 but chose to give next year's 33-64. Maybe the Raheem supplemental figured in, maybe they're thinking this year's 3's are more valuable than next year's 2's.

Maybe, Carolina just did a good job of holdout and insisting on next year's 2nd, maybe because both teams had Intel that Fiske was close to coming off the board???

Anyway, both things are true, pissed at the compensation price but love the pick.

 by ramsww
2 weeks 1 day ago
 Total posts:   475  
 Joined:  Aug 11 2022
United States of America   LA Coliseum
Starter

BrooklynRam74 wrote:It's definitely a lot. Rams could have approximated the value giving this year's pick 83 but chose to give next year's 33-64. Maybe the Raheem supplemental figured in, maybe they're thinking this year's 3's are more valuable than next year's 2's.

Maybe, Carolina just did a good job of holdout and insisting on next year's 2nd, maybe because both teams had Intel that Fiske was close to coming off the board???

Anyway, both things are true, pissed at the compensation price but love the pick.


At least they didn’t give up a 1st! lol

 by 69RamFan
2 weeks 1 day ago
 Total posts:   3208  
 Joined:  Oct 15 2016
United States of America   LA CA by way of NY/NJ
Superstar

Elvis wrote:And the Rams have another 3rd round comp coming next year for Raheem, but anyway you slice it, it's a lot.

Not saying it's a bad trade or anything like that but it's till a lot as far as that goes...


you have to figure,
Fiske & Verse played together,
that is gonna go well for them,
because they know each other's moves.

You'll have Turner and Young on one side, (Experience playing together for 1yr)
With Fiske and Verse on the other side. (Experience playing together for 1yr)

The RAMs are looking to make a SB run this year, and next year.

So as far as giving up 100 draft points,
it's well worth it. IMO

 by /zn/
2 weeks 1 day ago
 Total posts:   6784  
 Joined:  Jun 28 2015
United States of America   Maine
Hall of Fame

BrooklynRam74 wrote:It's definitely a lot. Rams could have approximated the value giving this year's pick 83 but chose to give next year's 33-64. Maybe the Raheem supplemental figured in, maybe they're thinking this year's 3's are more valuable than next year's 2's.

Maybe, Carolina just did a good job of holdout and insisting on next year's 2nd, maybe because both teams had Intel that Fiske was close to coming off the board???

Anyway, both things are true, pissed at the compensation price but love the pick.

I don't think it matters.

As it stand they can do this forever. In 2025 they can trade a 2026 pick or picks for a 2025 second rounder. On unto infinity. That is, they're only short a 2025 pick if and when they decide to just not trade for a new one.

This year, the thing that mattered to them was trading up while keeping the 2 3rd rounders. That's what they need now, they figure, in a year after they stripped down the defense. If they want to take advantage of having Stafford while they still have him, they need defensive picks they like in 2024. It doesn't matter that it cost a 2025 pick when they can replace 2025 picks with 2026 picks when the time comes, if they want (and then 2026 picks with 2027 picks and so on).

 by BrooklynRam74
2 weeks 1 day ago
 Total posts:   199  
 Joined:  Dec 07 2022
United States of America   LA Coliseum
Rookie

/zn/ wrote:I don't think it matters.

As it stand they can do this forever. In 2025 they can trade a 2026 pick or picks for a 2025 second rounder. On unto infinity. That is, they're only short a 2025 pick if and when they decide to just not trade for a new one.

This year, the thing that mattered to them was trading up while keeping the 2 3rd rounders. That's what they need now, they figure, in a year after they stripped down the defense. If they want to take advantage of having Stafford while they still have him, they need defensive picks they like in 2024. It doesn't matter that it cost a 2025 pick when they can replace 2025 picks with 2026 picks when the time comes, if they want (and then 2026 picks with 2027 picks and so on).


Makes sense. And I'll also give the benefit of the doubt and say they scouted the '25 draft already. They valued this year's 3rd over next year's 2nd. That's fine. Love Fiske.

 by ramsman34
2 weeks 1 day ago
 Total posts:   8625  
 Joined:  Apr 16 2015
United States of America   Back in LA baby!
Moderator

Isn’t really a lot to pay when you know other teams are trying to trade up for the same player. All about the market. A future 2 seems like a lot. But they have a number of opps to gain comp picks and they should be picking pretty low in each round 😎

  • 2 / 4
  • 1
  • 2
  • 4
40 posts May 12 2024