by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #1 TOPIC AUTHOR I asked @JericGriffin a few question on our behalf:1. Are your pieces on relocation purely opinion or is there also reporting involved? What are you basing your NFL/L.A. articles on?I typically don't break news; my columns are reactions to news that breaks and I try to include relevant information that isn't included in the original breaking news. My column today on the Chargers' relocation is a perfect example.2. Do you still think it's the Raiders and the Rams in L.A. in 2016?I think the Rams will be in L.A. in a temporary home in 2016 (Rose Bowl or L.A. Coliseum) while the new Inglewood stadium is being built. It'll likely be ready for the 2018 NFL season. I also think the Raiders or Chargers will join the Rams in Inglewood instead of joining forces in Carson, and if I had to bet, I'd say it'll be the Raiders.3. Any chance Spanos gets Kroenke and/or Davis to hold off for a year?I don't think anyone is holding off at all. The Rams and Raiders' leases are up after this season and the NFL is securing temporary homes for teams in L.A. next season. Kroenke is doing his own thing with no regard for anyone else and Davis won't hesitate to jump on board with him if/when the Chargers get things worked out to stay in San Diego. RFU Season Ticket Holder by max 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 5587 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #2 Post this on the PD board and run for cover. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #3 Nicely done Elvis. You've been a busy boy. I hope this Jeric cat is on top of it. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #4 TOPIC AUTHOR max wrote:Post this on the PD board and run for cover.Yeah, they're probably not big Jeric Griffin fans over there. But it would be wrong not to share... RFU Season Ticket Holder by TomSlick 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 2908 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Many of us know the feeling of the universe conspiring to bring car and driver together. Superstar Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #5 Hacksaw wrote:I hope this Jeric cat is on top of it.Well, Jeric agrees with me so his word is gold. lol.Oakland is a dung heap, nothing will be built there. Davis will be on the move.Elvis, thanks for acquiring this stuff. Old race cars and the men and women who piloted these beasts are covered in Vintage Motorsport magazine. The eras covered are about 1900 to the year 2010 or so. Great writing and photography. by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #6 TOPIC AUTHOR TomSlick wrote:Hacksaw wrote:I hope this Jeric cat is on top of it.Well, Jeric agrees with me so his word is gold. lol.Oakland is a dung heap, nothing will be built there. Davis will be on the move.Elvis, thanks for acquiring this stuff.No problem. Hey did you check out my Rams trash can in GD? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #7 Sweet can. I remember those. Break it out. Never put an AB product in it though,, that might begin electrolysis. (not the hair removal type) GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #8 TOPIC AUTHOR RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #9 We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by The Ripper 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #10 Hacksaw wrote:We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing.The problem with giving St Louis every chance is that there's a 20 year history. They did everything they could to get the team right from the start, The original deal contained a provision that either side could walk away if the relocation fee was over 7.5 million but FANS Inc decided to come up with the extra money to pay the NFL. That caused the CVC to miss guaranteed payments in the first few years of the lease. Then they delayed the 2005 review for 2 years and then came back with a low ball offer. Then their arbitration proposal. St Louis comes together for a crisis but what about the other 20 years. The Dome was required to be maintained a top tier facility at all time. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts May 13 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by max 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 5587 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #2 Post this on the PD board and run for cover. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #3 Nicely done Elvis. You've been a busy boy. I hope this Jeric cat is on top of it. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #4 TOPIC AUTHOR max wrote:Post this on the PD board and run for cover.Yeah, they're probably not big Jeric Griffin fans over there. But it would be wrong not to share... RFU Season Ticket Holder by TomSlick 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 2908 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Many of us know the feeling of the universe conspiring to bring car and driver together. Superstar Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #5 Hacksaw wrote:I hope this Jeric cat is on top of it.Well, Jeric agrees with me so his word is gold. lol.Oakland is a dung heap, nothing will be built there. Davis will be on the move.Elvis, thanks for acquiring this stuff. Old race cars and the men and women who piloted these beasts are covered in Vintage Motorsport magazine. The eras covered are about 1900 to the year 2010 or so. Great writing and photography. by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #6 TOPIC AUTHOR TomSlick wrote:Hacksaw wrote:I hope this Jeric cat is on top of it.Well, Jeric agrees with me so his word is gold. lol.Oakland is a dung heap, nothing will be built there. Davis will be on the move.Elvis, thanks for acquiring this stuff.No problem. Hey did you check out my Rams trash can in GD? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #7 Sweet can. I remember those. Break it out. Never put an AB product in it though,, that might begin electrolysis. (not the hair removal type) GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #8 TOPIC AUTHOR RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #9 We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by The Ripper 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #10 Hacksaw wrote:We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing.The problem with giving St Louis every chance is that there's a 20 year history. They did everything they could to get the team right from the start, The original deal contained a provision that either side could walk away if the relocation fee was over 7.5 million but FANS Inc decided to come up with the extra money to pay the NFL. That caused the CVC to miss guaranteed payments in the first few years of the lease. Then they delayed the 2005 review for 2 years and then came back with a low ball offer. Then their arbitration proposal. St Louis comes together for a crisis but what about the other 20 years. The Dome was required to be maintained a top tier facility at all time. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts May 13 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #3 Nicely done Elvis. You've been a busy boy. I hope this Jeric cat is on top of it. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #4 TOPIC AUTHOR max wrote:Post this on the PD board and run for cover.Yeah, they're probably not big Jeric Griffin fans over there. But it would be wrong not to share... RFU Season Ticket Holder by TomSlick 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 2908 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Many of us know the feeling of the universe conspiring to bring car and driver together. Superstar Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #5 Hacksaw wrote:I hope this Jeric cat is on top of it.Well, Jeric agrees with me so his word is gold. lol.Oakland is a dung heap, nothing will be built there. Davis will be on the move.Elvis, thanks for acquiring this stuff. Old race cars and the men and women who piloted these beasts are covered in Vintage Motorsport magazine. The eras covered are about 1900 to the year 2010 or so. Great writing and photography. by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #6 TOPIC AUTHOR TomSlick wrote:Hacksaw wrote:I hope this Jeric cat is on top of it.Well, Jeric agrees with me so his word is gold. lol.Oakland is a dung heap, nothing will be built there. Davis will be on the move.Elvis, thanks for acquiring this stuff.No problem. Hey did you check out my Rams trash can in GD? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #7 Sweet can. I remember those. Break it out. Never put an AB product in it though,, that might begin electrolysis. (not the hair removal type) GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #8 TOPIC AUTHOR RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #9 We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by The Ripper 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #10 Hacksaw wrote:We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing.The problem with giving St Louis every chance is that there's a 20 year history. They did everything they could to get the team right from the start, The original deal contained a provision that either side could walk away if the relocation fee was over 7.5 million but FANS Inc decided to come up with the extra money to pay the NFL. That caused the CVC to miss guaranteed payments in the first few years of the lease. Then they delayed the 2005 review for 2 years and then came back with a low ball offer. Then their arbitration proposal. St Louis comes together for a crisis but what about the other 20 years. The Dome was required to be maintained a top tier facility at all time. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts May 13 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #4 TOPIC AUTHOR max wrote:Post this on the PD board and run for cover.Yeah, they're probably not big Jeric Griffin fans over there. But it would be wrong not to share... RFU Season Ticket Holder by TomSlick 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 2908 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Many of us know the feeling of the universe conspiring to bring car and driver together. Superstar Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #5 Hacksaw wrote:I hope this Jeric cat is on top of it.Well, Jeric agrees with me so his word is gold. lol.Oakland is a dung heap, nothing will be built there. Davis will be on the move.Elvis, thanks for acquiring this stuff. Old race cars and the men and women who piloted these beasts are covered in Vintage Motorsport magazine. The eras covered are about 1900 to the year 2010 or so. Great writing and photography. by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #6 TOPIC AUTHOR TomSlick wrote:Hacksaw wrote:I hope this Jeric cat is on top of it.Well, Jeric agrees with me so his word is gold. lol.Oakland is a dung heap, nothing will be built there. Davis will be on the move.Elvis, thanks for acquiring this stuff.No problem. Hey did you check out my Rams trash can in GD? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #7 Sweet can. I remember those. Break it out. Never put an AB product in it though,, that might begin electrolysis. (not the hair removal type) GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #8 TOPIC AUTHOR RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #9 We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by The Ripper 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #10 Hacksaw wrote:We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing.The problem with giving St Louis every chance is that there's a 20 year history. They did everything they could to get the team right from the start, The original deal contained a provision that either side could walk away if the relocation fee was over 7.5 million but FANS Inc decided to come up with the extra money to pay the NFL. That caused the CVC to miss guaranteed payments in the first few years of the lease. Then they delayed the 2005 review for 2 years and then came back with a low ball offer. Then their arbitration proposal. St Louis comes together for a crisis but what about the other 20 years. The Dome was required to be maintained a top tier facility at all time. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts May 13 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by TomSlick 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 2908 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Many of us know the feeling of the universe conspiring to bring car and driver together. Superstar Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #5 Hacksaw wrote:I hope this Jeric cat is on top of it.Well, Jeric agrees with me so his word is gold. lol.Oakland is a dung heap, nothing will be built there. Davis will be on the move.Elvis, thanks for acquiring this stuff. Old race cars and the men and women who piloted these beasts are covered in Vintage Motorsport magazine. The eras covered are about 1900 to the year 2010 or so. Great writing and photography. by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #6 TOPIC AUTHOR TomSlick wrote:Hacksaw wrote:I hope this Jeric cat is on top of it.Well, Jeric agrees with me so his word is gold. lol.Oakland is a dung heap, nothing will be built there. Davis will be on the move.Elvis, thanks for acquiring this stuff.No problem. Hey did you check out my Rams trash can in GD? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #7 Sweet can. I remember those. Break it out. Never put an AB product in it though,, that might begin electrolysis. (not the hair removal type) GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #8 TOPIC AUTHOR RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #9 We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by The Ripper 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #10 Hacksaw wrote:We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing.The problem with giving St Louis every chance is that there's a 20 year history. They did everything they could to get the team right from the start, The original deal contained a provision that either side could walk away if the relocation fee was over 7.5 million but FANS Inc decided to come up with the extra money to pay the NFL. That caused the CVC to miss guaranteed payments in the first few years of the lease. Then they delayed the 2005 review for 2 years and then came back with a low ball offer. Then their arbitration proposal. St Louis comes together for a crisis but what about the other 20 years. The Dome was required to be maintained a top tier facility at all time. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts May 13 2024
by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #6 TOPIC AUTHOR TomSlick wrote:Hacksaw wrote:I hope this Jeric cat is on top of it.Well, Jeric agrees with me so his word is gold. lol.Oakland is a dung heap, nothing will be built there. Davis will be on the move.Elvis, thanks for acquiring this stuff.No problem. Hey did you check out my Rams trash can in GD? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #7 Sweet can. I remember those. Break it out. Never put an AB product in it though,, that might begin electrolysis. (not the hair removal type) GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #8 TOPIC AUTHOR RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #9 We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by The Ripper 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #10 Hacksaw wrote:We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing.The problem with giving St Louis every chance is that there's a 20 year history. They did everything they could to get the team right from the start, The original deal contained a provision that either side could walk away if the relocation fee was over 7.5 million but FANS Inc decided to come up with the extra money to pay the NFL. That caused the CVC to miss guaranteed payments in the first few years of the lease. Then they delayed the 2005 review for 2 years and then came back with a low ball offer. Then their arbitration proposal. St Louis comes together for a crisis but what about the other 20 years. The Dome was required to be maintained a top tier facility at all time. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts May 13 2024
by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #7 Sweet can. I remember those. Break it out. Never put an AB product in it though,, that might begin electrolysis. (not the hair removal type) GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #8 TOPIC AUTHOR RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #9 We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by The Ripper 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #10 Hacksaw wrote:We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing.The problem with giving St Louis every chance is that there's a 20 year history. They did everything they could to get the team right from the start, The original deal contained a provision that either side could walk away if the relocation fee was over 7.5 million but FANS Inc decided to come up with the extra money to pay the NFL. That caused the CVC to miss guaranteed payments in the first few years of the lease. Then they delayed the 2005 review for 2 years and then came back with a low ball offer. Then their arbitration proposal. St Louis comes together for a crisis but what about the other 20 years. The Dome was required to be maintained a top tier facility at all time. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts May 13 2024
by Elvis 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 38705 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #8 TOPIC AUTHOR RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #9 We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by The Ripper 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #10 Hacksaw wrote:We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing.The problem with giving St Louis every chance is that there's a 20 year history. They did everything they could to get the team right from the start, The original deal contained a provision that either side could walk away if the relocation fee was over 7.5 million but FANS Inc decided to come up with the extra money to pay the NFL. That caused the CVC to miss guaranteed payments in the first few years of the lease. Then they delayed the 2005 review for 2 years and then came back with a low ball offer. Then their arbitration proposal. St Louis comes together for a crisis but what about the other 20 years. The Dome was required to be maintained a top tier facility at all time. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts May 13 2024
by Hacksaw 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #9 We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by The Ripper 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #10 Hacksaw wrote:We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing.The problem with giving St Louis every chance is that there's a 20 year history. They did everything they could to get the team right from the start, The original deal contained a provision that either side could walk away if the relocation fee was over 7.5 million but FANS Inc decided to come up with the extra money to pay the NFL. That caused the CVC to miss guaranteed payments in the first few years of the lease. Then they delayed the 2005 review for 2 years and then came back with a low ball offer. Then their arbitration proposal. St Louis comes together for a crisis but what about the other 20 years. The Dome was required to be maintained a top tier facility at all time. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts May 13 2024
by The Ripper 8 years 10 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: RFU Q&A with Jeric Griffin of RantSports POST #10 Hacksaw wrote:We all guessed that could be the case. The league must have a clue. But is that any big deal in the scheme of things? ESK tried to work with StL but most likely doesn't want to any more. Apparently that is the same with Spanos. Did ESK give it every chance? probably not. Did Spanos? probably not. Did either try enough? probably. So what is the difference between the two? Not motive as they are both trying to enrich themselves financially. The only difference might be is the honesty, and ulterior motive simply to block ESK and possibly with a pinch of spite blended in. Sure is hard to read this thing.The problem with giving St Louis every chance is that there's a 20 year history. They did everything they could to get the team right from the start, The original deal contained a provision that either side could walk away if the relocation fee was over 7.5 million but FANS Inc decided to come up with the extra money to pay the NFL. That caused the CVC to miss guaranteed payments in the first few years of the lease. Then they delayed the 2005 review for 2 years and then came back with a low ball offer. Then their arbitration proposal. St Louis comes together for a crisis but what about the other 20 years. The Dome was required to be maintained a top tier facility at all time. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business